Assessment of tolerance and acceptability between mannitol solution and polyethylene glycol as bowel preparation for colonoscopy: a three-center study / Evaluación de tolerancia y aceptabilidad entre la solución de manitol y el polietilenglicol como preparación intestinal para la colonoscopía: un estudio de tres centros

ABSTRACT Introduction: Adequate bowel preparation is one of the most important factors related to the yield of colonoscopy. Low quality bowel preparation has been associated with lower adenoma detection rates and increased healthcare expenses. Bowel preparation is a major impediment to undergo colonoscopy since it is perceived as an unpleasant experience by patients. Objective: This study was aimed to assess tolerance and acceptability of the bowel preparation using either polyethylene glycol (PEG) or mannitol solution. Materials and methods: We enrolled 140 patients with indications of screening for colorectal cancer or with suspected large bowel diseases. They received either mannitol solution or PEG as bowel preparation. Patients were asked to fill a questionnaire about the bowel preparation experience. Results: Patients perceived more burdensome the preparation with PEG than mannitol for the variables nausea overall experience, post-procedure discomfort, disagreeable flavor, volume ingested and cost (p<0.05). A similar tolerance was reported for abdominal pain, bloating and anal irritation (p>0.05). The acceptability was 82.9% and 71.4% in the Mannitol group and in the PEG group, respectively (p=0.10). Conclusion: Acceptance of the bowel preparation between mannitol solution and PEG was comparable. However, mannitol was better tolerated by the patients in regard to most of the evaluated items.

RESUMEN Introducción: La preparación intestinal adecuada es uno de los factores más importantes relacionados con el rendimiento de la colonoscopía. La preparación intestinal de baja calidad se ha asociado con tasas de detección de adenoma más bajas y mayores gastos de atención sanitaria. La preparación intestinal es un impedimento importante para someterse a una colonoscopía, ya que los pacientes la perciben como una experiencia desagradable. Objetivo: Este estudio tuvo como objetivo evaluar la tolerancia y la aceptabilidad de la preparación intestinal utilizando polietilenglicol (PEG) o solución de manitol. Materiales y métodos: Fueron incluidos 140 pacientes con indicación de pesquisa de cáncer colorrectal o con sospecha de enfermedades del intestino grueso. Los pacientes recibieron solución de manitol o PEG como preparación intestinal. Se pidió a los pacientes que completaran un cuestionario sobre la experiencia de preparación intestinal. Resultados: Los pacientes percibieron más agobiante la preparación con PEG que el manitol para las variables náuseas, experiencia general, molestias posteriores al procedimiento, sabor desagradable, volumen ingerido y costo (p<0,05). Se informó una tolerancia similar para el dolor abdominal, distensión abdominal e irritación anal (p>0,05). La aceptabilidad fue de 82,9% y 71,4% en el grupo de manitol y en el grupo de PEG, respectivamente (p=0,10). Conclusión: La aceptación de la preparación intestinal entre la solución de manitol y el PEG fue comparable. Sin embargo, el manitol fue mejor tolerado por los pacientes con respecto a la mayoría de las variables evaluadas.

New bowel preparation technique for colonoscopy: clinical trial comparing aquanet and mannitol / Nova técnica de preparo intestinal para colonoscopia: estudo clínico comparativo entre aquanet e manitol

ABSTRACT Background: Fifty-five percent of Americans aged 50-65 are submitted to colonoscopy. For over 65-year, this number increases to 64%. In Brazil, it is forecast that the population submitted to colonoscopy will grow, even though inadequate preparation is still a major problem. Aim: To analyze the quality of a new intestinal preparation technique, Aquanet EC-2000®, compared to oral Mannitol solution. Methods: This prospective longitudinal study enrolled 200 patients with indication for colonoscopy. The sample was randomly allocated to two groups of 100; one group received Aquanet EC-2000® to prepare for colonoscopy and the other Mannitol solution. The Boston scale was used to analyze the results. Results: As expected both preparations produced similar results with the bowel cleansing of the different regions of the colon being classified as Boston scale 3 (excellent) in most patients (p>0.05). Conclusion: The results of bowel preparation using Aquanet EC-2000® were similar to using Mannitol solution.

RESUMO Racional: Cinquenta e cinco por cento dos norte-americanos entre 50-65 anos fazem colonoscopia. Acima de 65 anos o número foi de 64%. No Brasil, estima-se crescente aumento da população submetida à colonoscopia, apesar da preparação inadequada ainda ser um grande problema. Objetivo: Analisar e comparar a qualidade do novo método de preparo intestinal por meio do Aquanet EC-2000® frente ao uso de solução oral de Manitol. Método: Por randomização 200 pacientes foram divididos em dois grupos de 100. Um recebeu Aquanet EC-2000® e o outro Manitol. O presente estudo seguiu modelo prospectivo longitudinal por meio da seleção de 200 pacientes com indicação à colonoscopia, formando dois grupos de 100. Para analisar os resultados foi utilizada a escala de Boston. Resultados: Ambos os preparos foram estatisticamente significativos com p<0,05. A escala 3 de Boston foi a mais frequente para ambos os métodos.Além disso, na estatística aplicada às diferentes regiões do cólon para ambos os procedimentos as proporções observadas concordaram com o esperado (3-excelente). Conclusão: Os resultados do preparo intestinal utilizando Aquanet EC-2000® foram semelhantes aos do Manitol.

Estudio comparativo entre el uso de manitol y el picosulfato sódico como preparación para colonoscopía / Comparison of colon-cleansing methods in preparation for colonoscopy- comparative of solutions of mannitol and sodium picosulfate

Objetivos: El objetivo del presente estudio es comparar la preparación adecuada del colon con manitol y picosulfato sódico. Evaluar la aceptación de los pacientes, los efectos secundarios y la capacidad de limpieza. Materiales y métodos: Este es un estudio no aleatorio, prospectivo, ciego, en que el evaluador no tenía información sobre la preparación aplicada. La muestra obtenida se dividió en dos grupos de acuerdo con la preparación adecuada del colon, con 153 pacientes preparados con manitol al 10% y 84 pacientes con picosulfato sódico. La evaluación de la preparación se realizó usando la Escala de Boston (Boston Bowel Preparation Scale - BBP) a través de un sistema de puntuación para cada región del colon puntuada con 3 puntos: derecha, izquierda y colon transverso. Resultados: De los 237 pacientes que fueron evaluados, 146 (61,60%) eran mujeres y 91 (38,4%) eran hombres. En el grupo que utilizó manitol, 98 (64,05%) eran mujeres y 55 (35,95%) eran varones. Entre los pacientes que utilizaron picosulfato sódico, 48 (57,14%)eran mujeres y 36 (42,86%) eran hombres, sin diferencias estadísticas de ambos grupos (p>0,32). Teniendo en cuenta que con la adecuada preparación del colon y con puntuación de 6 puntos en la Escala de Boston, la preparación intestinal fue satisfactoria en ambos grupos. El 93% de los pacientes que utilizaron manitol y el 81% de los pacientes que utilizaron picosulfato sódico tenían preparación adecuada (puntuación de 6). La puntuación media en la preparación con manitol fue de 9 y en la preparación con picosulfato sódico fue de 7. No hubo diferencias significativas entre ambos grupos. Conclusión: Ambas preparaciones, demostraron ser seguras y eficaces para la limpieza del intestino, de acuerdo con la Escala de Boston, así como, la aceptabilidad de los pacientes y libre de complicaciones

Objectives: The purpose of the present study is to compare intestinal preparation with mannitol and sodium picosulphate, assessing patient’s acceptance, side effects and cleaning capacity. Material and methods: This is a prospective, nom randomized, blind study, in which the evaluator had no information about the preparation applied. The sample obtained was divided into two groups according to the bowel preparation applied, with 153 patients prepared with 10% mannitol and 84 patients with sodium picosulfate. The evaluation of colon preparation was done using the Boston Scale (Boston Bowel Preparation Scale - BBP) through a three-point scoring system for each of the three regions of the colon: right, left and transverse colon. Results: Of the 237 patients that were evaluated, 146 (61.60%) were female and 91 (38.4%) were male. Regarding the group that used mannitol, 98 were female (64.05%) and 55 were male (35.95%). Among the patients who used sodium picosulfate, 48 were female (57.14%) and 36 were male (42.86%), with no statistical differences between both groups (p> 0.32). Considering that an adequate preparation scores ≥ 6 in the Boston Scale, the bowel cleansing preparation was satisfactory in both groups. 93% of the patients who used mannitol and 81% of the patients who used sodium picosulfate had adequate preparation (score of ≥ 6). Moreover, we consider that the average score in the preparation with Mannitol was 9, while the sodium picosulfate score was 7. There were no significant differences between the two groups. Conclusion: There is consensus among authors who state that colonoscopy’s safety and success are highly related to the cleansing outcome, regardless of the method used. The same can be observed in the present study, on which both preparations were proved safe and effective for bowel cleansing, according to the Boston scale, as well as accepted by patients and free of complications

Safety of mannitol use in bowel preparation: a prospective assessment of intestinal methane (CH4) levels during colonoscopy after mannitol and sodium phosphate (NaP) bowel cleansing / Segurança do uso do manitol no preparo para colonoscopia: avaliação prospectiva do nível de metano (CH4) intestinal durante colonoscopia após preparo com manitol e fosfato de sódio (NaP)

ABSTRACT Background - Adequate bowel preparation is critical for the quality of colonoscopy. Despite reported occurrence of colonic explosion due to methane and hydrogen production by bacterial fermentation during colonoscopy, gas exchange during the procedure is believed to be effective in lowering existing methane concentration, allowing for safe utilization of mannitol for bowel preparation. Thus, mannitol is widely used for bowel cleansing prior to colonoscopy, considering its low cost and effectiveness for bowel preparation. Objective - The aim of this study was to assess the safety of mannitol for bowel preparation, when compared to sodium phosphate (NaP). Methods - We conducted a prospective observational study in which 250 patients undergoing colonoscopy at Universidade Federal de São Paulo and Hospital Albert Einstein (São Paulo, Brazil) were approached for inclusion in the study. Patients received either mannitol (n=50) or NaP (n=200) for bowel preparation, based on physician indication. Study was conducted from August 2009 to December 2009. The main outcome of interest was presence of detectable levels of methane (CH4) during colonoscopy and reduction in such levels after gas exchange during the procedure. Methane concentrations were measured in three intestinal segments during scope introduction and withdrawal. Safety was assessed as the absence of high levels of methane, defined as 5%. Measurements were made using a multi-gas monitor (X-am 7000, Dräger Safety AG & Co. KGaA, Lübeck, Germany) connected to a plastic catheter introduced into the working channel of the colonoscope. Additional outcomes of interest included levels of O2. Methane and O2 levels are reported as ppm. Mean, difference and standard deviation of levels of gas measured in both moments were calculated and compared in both groups. Proportions of patients with detectable or high levels of methane in both groups were compared. Continuous variables were analyzed using t test and categorical variables using qui-square tests. The Ethics Committee in both study sites approved the study protocol. Results - Patients in both groups were similar regarding demographics, colonoscopy indication, ASA status and quality of bowel preparation. Seven (3.5%) patients in the NaP group had methane detected during introduction of the endoscope. Methane levels became undetectable during withdrawal of the scope. None of the patients in the mannitol group had detectable levels of methane. O2 levels did not differ in the groups. Conclusion - This is the largest study to assess the safety of mannitol for bowel preparation, considering methane measurements. Our results indicate that mannitol use is as safe as NaP, and gas exchange was efficient in reducing methane concentrations.

RESUMO Contexto - Preparo adequado é fundamental para garantia de boa qualidade em colonoscopia. Apesar de relatos de explosão do cólon durante colonoscopia, secundários à produção de metano e hidrogênio pela fermentação bacteriana, acredita-se que a troca gasosa durante o procedimento diminua a concentração existente de metano, permitindo a utilização com segurança, de manitol para o preparo de cólon. Assim, manitol é largamente utilizado para limpeza dos cólons antes da colonoscopia, especialmente devido ao seu baixo custo e eficácia. Objetivo - O objetivo do estudo foi avaliar a segurança do uso de manitol no preparo dos cólons, quando comparado ao uso de fosfo-soda (NaP). Métodos - Este foi um estudo observacional retrospectivo no qual foram incluídos 250 pacientes submetidos a colonoscopia na Universidade Federal de São Paulo e Hospital Albert Einstein (São Paulo - Brasil). Os pacientes receberam preparo de cólon com manitol (n=50) ou NaP (n=200), de acordo com preferências dos médicos que encaminharam os pacientes. O estudo foi realizado entre agosto e dezembro de 2009. O principal resultado pesquisado foi a presença de níveis detectáveis de metano (CH4) durante a colonoscopia, e a redução nestes níveis após troca gasosa durante o procedimento. As concentrações de metano foram dosadas com detector multi-gas (X-am 7000, Dräger Safety AG & Co., KGaA, Lübeck, Alemanha) conectado a um cateter plástico que foi introduzido no canal de instrumentação do colonoscópio. Outro achado de interesse foram níveis de O2. Níveis de metano e O2 foram relatados em ppm. Média, diferença entre as médias e desvio padrão nos níveis dos gases em ambos momentos foram comparados nos dois grupos. A proporção de pacientes com níveis detectáveis ou altos de metano em ambos os grupos foram comparados. Variáveis contínuas foram analisadas com teste t e variáveis categóricas com o teste do qui-quadrado. Os Comitês de Ética de ambas instituições aprovaram o protocolo do estudo. Resultados - Pacientes nos dois grupos foram comparáveis quanto aos dados demográficos, indicação para colonoscopia, classificação ASA e qualidade do preparo do cólon. Sete (3,5%) pacientes no grupo NaP tinham níveis detectáveis de metano durante a introdução do colonoscópio. Os níveis de metano se tornaram indetectáveis durante a retirada do aparelho. Nenhum dos pacientes no grupo manitol tinha níveis detectáveis de metano. Níveis de O2 foram semelhantes nos dois grupos. Conclusão - Este é o estudo com maior casuística que avaliou a segurança do uso de manitol para preparo de cólon, no que diz respeito a dosagem de metano. Nossos resultados indicam que o emprego do manitol é tão seguro quanto o NaP, e que a troca gasosa é eficaz na redução da concentração de metano.

Fluid volume kinetics of dilutional hyponatremia; a shock syndrome revisited

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether the pathophysiology of shock syndromes can be better understood by comparing central hemodynamics with kinetic data on fluid and electrolyte shifts. METHODS: We studied the dilutional hyponatremic shock that developed in response to overhydration with electrolyte-free irrigating fluid - the so-called ‘transurethral resection syndrome' - by comparing cardiac output, arterial pressures, and volume kinetic parameters in 17 pigs that were administered 150 ml/kg of either 1.5% glycine or 5% mannitol by intravenous infusion over 90 minutes. RESULTS: Natriuresis appeared to be the key factor promoting hypovolemic hypotension 15-20 minutes after fluid administration ended. Excessive sodium excretion, due to osmotic diuresis caused by the irrigant solutes, was associated with high estimates of the elimination rate constant (k10) and low or negative estimates of the rate constant describing re-distribution of fluid to the plasma after translocation to the interstitium (k21). These characteristics indicated a high urinary flow rate and the development of peripheral edema at the expense of plasma volume and were correlated with reductions in cardiac output. The same general effects of natriuresis were observed for both irrigating solutions, although the volume of infused 1.5% glycine had a higher tendency to enter the intracellular fluid space. CONCLUSION: Comparisons between hemodynamics and fluid turnover showed a likely sequence of events that led to hypovolemia despite intravenous administration of large amounts of fluid. .

Hemodynamic effects of mannitol infusion in patients with acute intracerebral hemorrhage

PURPOSE: To evaluate hemodynamic effects of mannitol infusion in patients with acute intracerebral hemorrhage. METHODS: Thirty patients with acute intracerebral hemorrhage were enrolled. Transcranial doppler was used to detect variables of bilateral middle cerebral arteria (MCA) including mean velocity (Vm) and pulsitility index (PI) before and after125ml and 250ml mannitol infusion (0, 30, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240 min). RESULTS: When 125ml or 250ml mannitol was infused in patients with acute intracerebral hemorrhage, Vm of bilateral MCA elevated, and reached the top at 30min, and then decreased. PI decreased in the affected MCA (250ml) and in the unaffected MCA (125ml and 250ml). CONCLUSION: Mannitol infusion in patients with acute intracerebral hemorrhage can improve cerebral blood flow in bilateral hemispheres and decrease intracranial pressure in the hemorrhagic hemisphere (250ml) and in the nonhemorrhagic hemisphere (125ml and 250ml).

Modulation of Antibody Responses against Gnathostoma spinigerum in Mice Immunized with Crude Antigen Formulated in CpG Oligonucleotide and Montanide ISA720

This study aimed to investigate the antibody responses in mice immunized with Gnathostoma spinigerum crude antigen (GsAg) incorporated with the combined adjuvant, a synthetic oligonucleotide containing unmethylated CpG motif (CpG ODN 1826) and a stable water in oil emulsion (Montanide ISA720). Mice immunized with GsAg and combined adjuvant produced all antibody classes and subclasses to GsAg except IgA. IgG2a/2b/3 but not IgG1 subclasses were enhanced by immunization with CpG ODN 1826 when compared with the control groups immunized with non-CpG ODN and Montanide ISA or only with Montanide ISA, suggesting a biased induction of a Th1-type response by CpG ODN. After challenge infection with live G. spinigerum larvae, the levels of IgG2a/2b/3 antibody subclasses decreased immediately and continuously, while the IgG1 subclass remained at high levels. This also corresponded to a continuous decrease of the IgG2a/IgG1 ratio after infection. Only IgM and IgG1 antibodies, but not IgG2a/2b/3, were significantly produced in adjuvant control groups after infection. These findings suggest that G. spinigerum infection potently induces a Th2-type biased response.

Bowel preparation for performing a colonoscopy: prospective randomized comparison study between a low-volume solution of polyethylene glycol and bisacodyl versus bisacodyl and a mannitol solution / Preparo de cólon para realização de colonoscopia: estudo prospectivo randomizado comparativo entre solução de polietilenoglicol baixo volume mais bisacodil versus solução de manitol mais bisacodil

CONTEXT: Colonoscopy is currently the gold standard method to examine the colon, the rectum and the terminal ileum. In order to perform the colonoscopy, it is necessary to clean the bowel and use medications that are generally poorly tolerated by the patients. OBJECTIVE: Compare the tolerability, acceptability, safety and efficacy of two solutions used for intestinal preparation for a colonoscopy. METHODS: One hundred patients matched for sex and age were prospective randomized into two groups. Polyethylene glycol group received bisacodyl 10 mg plus 1 L of polyethylene glycol the night before and 1 L on the day of the exam. Mannitol group received bisacodyl 20 mg the day before and 1 L of a 10% mannitol solution on the day of the exam. The diet was the same for both groups. Tolerability and acceptability were measured using previously validated questionnaires. In terms of safety, variations in vital signs before and after the preparation were recorded, in addition to any complications. The quality of the preparation was graded based on the Boston and Ottawa scales. RESULTS: Ninety-six percent (96%) completed the study. As for tolerability, the mannitol preparation group exhibited a significantly higher frequency of nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, and abdominal distension than polyethylene glycol group (P < 0.05). Acceptability was significantly better in polyethylene glycol group. The polyethylene glycol solution has also previously been shown to be safer than mannitol. No difference was observed in the quality of the preparation between the two preparation methods. CONCLUSIONS: The following conclusions can be made: polyethylene glycol solution had higher tolerability, acceptability, and safety than the mannitol and should be used instead of mannitol. Both preparation solutions have similar efficacy.

CONTEXTO: O exame de colonoscopia é atualmente o padrão-ouro para investigação do cólon e íleo terminal. Para sua realização há necessidade de limpeza do cólon com soluções que, em geral, são mal toleradas pelos pacientes. OBJETIVO: Comparar duas soluções de preparo intestinal para colonoscopia quanto à tolerabilidade, aceitabilidade, segurança e efetividade. MÉTODOS: Cem pacientes pareados por sexo e idade foram randomizados prospectivamente em dois grupos. O grupo polietilenoglicol recebeu bisacodil 10 mg + 1 litro de polietilenoglicol na véspera e 1 litro no dia do exame. O grupo manitol recebeu bisacodil 20 mg na véspera e 1 litro de manitol 10% no dia do exame. A dieta foi a mesma nos dois grupos. A tolerabilidade e aceitabilidade foram aferidas por questionários previamente validados. Quanto à segurança foram avaliados: variação de sinais vitais antes e após o preparo e complicações, além de quaisquer sinais de complicação. A qualidade do preparo foi graduada através das escalas de Boston e Ottawa. RESULTADOS: Noventa e seis pacientes (96%) completaram o estudo. Quanto à tolerabilidade o grupo manitol apresentou manifestação significativamente maior de náusea, vômito, dor abdominal e distensão abdominal do que o grupo polietilenoglicol (P<0,05). Aceitabilidade foi significativamente melhor com o grupo polietilenoglicol. O grupo polietilenoglicol também se mostrou mais seguro. Não se observou diferença na qualidade do preparo entre os métodos. CONCLUSÕES: A solução de polietilenoglicol apresentou melhor tolerabilidade, aceitabilidade e segurança e deve ser usada ao invés da solução de manitol. Ambas as soluções são semelhantes em eficácia.

Cilioretinal artery occlusion following intranasal cocaine insufflations.

Cocaine is used to produce a euphoric effect by abusers, who may be unaware of the devastating systemic and ocular side effects of this drug. We describe the first known case of cilioretinal artery occlusion after intranasal cocaine abuse.

Preparo do intestino grosso para a coloscopia: usos, abusos e idéias controversas / Bowel preparation for colonoscopy: myths and misconceptions

O uso rotineiro do exame coloscópico para avaliação, diagnóstico e procedimentos terapêutico das doenças dos cólons e do reto, bem como para rastreamento e prevenção do câncer colorretal, seja em pessoas jovens portadores de doenças reconhecidamente pré-malignas ou em pessoas acima do 50 anos de idade, tem sido considerado um dos mais bem sucedidos projetos de saúde pública de extensão mundial. A fácil aceitação se deve a três principais fatores: primeiro, à adequação técnica e evolução dos aparelhos e a segurança do exame; segundo, ao desenvolvimento prático das habilidades do examinador e, terceiro, a magnificência da imagem revelando amplo acesso às finas características da mucosa, com critérios abrangentes para o diagnóstico. Nesse contexto, o preparo necessário para o resultado expressivo que se intenta tornou-se a parte pior ou menos tolerável da coloscopia, razão pela qual o que está em discussão atualmente é a necessária busca com o objetivo de se encontrar um método de preparo, rápido, eficiente, barato, agradável e, principalmente seguro. Nos últimos 40 anos, entre as várias fórmulas - mecânicas e farmacológicas - com diferentes associações de drogas laxativas, tem sido possível destacar três produtos que, pelo menos por algum tempo, foram referências mundiais na limpeza dos cólons que antecede a coloscopia. São eles: primeiro, a solução de manitol a 10 por cento - descartado por causa de acidentes explosivos; segundo, as soluções de polietileno glicol (PEG), depreciado por conta da exigência da ingestão oral de grandes volumes, pelos consequentes distúrbios do equilíbrio hidroeletrolítico e pela rejeição por parte do paciente; e, o terceiro, o fosfato de sódio (NaP) que poderia parecer ideal, mas vem recebendo críticas veementes por causa de seus efeitos colaterais, mormente os nefrotóxicos. Não está em jogo a eficácia desses três produtos, mas a segurança que deveria determinar seus usos indiscriminados para propiciar as melhores condições para os mais adequados exames. Estamos diante de um impasse: o manitol, mundialmente proscrito, continua sendo indicado entre nós, sem causar problemas, num esquema posológico diferente do que foi usado no passado e que influenciou os acidentes. Por outro lado, a industria farmacêutica não conseguiu popularizar o PEG; o NaP, fabricado para uso retal, substituiu os antecessores com limpeza eficiente, mas com ações lesivas significativas, principalmente renais. Assim, o que nos resta é resgatar o manitol - demonstrar por meio de um estudo prospectivo, casualizado, que o manitol a 10 por cento ingerido pelo menos até 4 horas antes da coloscopia é totalmente inócuo para o procedimento de diagnóstico e de terapêutica.

The routine of the colonoscopic examination for therapeutic evaluation, for diagnosis, and management of the diseases of the colon and of the rectum, as well as for screening and prevention of the colorectal cancer in young patients bearing premalignant diseases or in those above 50 years of age, as well as for screening and prevention of the colorectal cancer in young patients bearing premalignant diseases or in those above 50 years of age, has been one of the most successful public health projects worldwide71. The easy acceptance is due to three principal factors: first, to the technical adaptation and evolution of the instruments, and the safety of the examination; second one, to the practical development of the examiner skills, and, thirdly, to the magnificence of the image revealing broad access to the fine structures of the mucous membrane, with a large criteria for the diagnosis. In this context, the necessary preparation became the worst part or less tolerable of the colonoscopy. For this reason, it is necessary to look for a method of preparation, quick, efficient, cheap, pleasant, and safe. In the last 40 years, between the commentaries on mechanical and pharmacological methods - with different associations of laxative drugs - it was possible to find three products that, at least during some time, were world-wide references on large bowel cleaning for colonoscopy. They are: first, a 10 percent mannitol solution - it was dropped because of explosives accidents ; second, the polyethylene glycol (PEG) solutions, it was depreciated due to the requirement of large volumes for oral ingestion, due to electrolytic balance disturbance and rejection by the patient, and the third, the sodium phosphate (NaP) that would seem ideal, but that has received criticism because of its side effects, especially the nephrotoxicity. There is no the discussion on the efficiency of these three products, but on the safety with which we might promote their indiscriminate uses to offer the best conditions on performance of the colonoscopy. However, we have an impasse: the mannitol was abandoned, but it keeps on indicated among us, without causing problems, in a scheme that is different from which was used in the past when it influenced the accidents. On the other hand, the pharmaceutical industry did not manage to popularize PEG; the NaP is manufactured for rectal use, it substituted the predecessors with efficient cleaning, but with significantly harmful lesions. So, which remains for us is to rescue the mannitol - for that, we must evidence through a randomized trial that a oral ingestion of 10 percent mannitol solution, at least up to 4 hours before the colonoscopy, is totally harmless on diagnosis and therapeutic procedures.

Isoniazid Toxicity Presenting As Status Epilepticus and Severe Metabolic Acidosis.

Isoniazid (INH) is an integral component of treatment of tuberculosis. An acute overdose is potentially fatal and is characterized by the clinical triad of repetitive seizures unresponsive to the usual anticonvulsants, metabolic acidosis with a high anion gap and coma. The diagnosis of INH overdose should be considered in any patient who presents to emergency medical services (EMS) with the triad. We report a patient presenting with multiple generalised tonic clonic (GTC) convulsions with severe metabolic acidosis as a manifestation of INH toxicity. ©

Randomized clinical trial comparing sodium picosulfate with mannitol on the preparation FOR colonoscopy in hospitalized patients

BACKGROUND: The cleansing of the colon for a colonoscopy exam must be complete so as to allow the visualization and inspection of the intestinal lumen. The ideal cleansing agent should be easily administered, have a low cost, and minimum collateral effects. Sodium picosulfate together with the magnesium citrate is a cathartic stimulant and mannitol is an osmotic laxative, both usually used for this purpose. AIMS: Assess the colon cleanliness comparing the use of mannitol and sodium picosulfate as well as evaluate the level of patient satisfaction, the presence of foam, pain, and abdominal distension in hospitalized patients undergoing colonoscopy. METHODS: A prospective, randomized, single-blind study with 80 patients that compared two groups: mannitol (40) and sodium picosulfate (40). Both groups received the same dietary orientation. The study was approved by the hospital’s Ethics and Research Committee. The endoscopist was blind to the type of preparation. Outcomes evaluated: level of the colon’s cleanliness, patient’s satisfaction, the presence of foam, abdominal pain and distension, and the duration of the exam. The data was analyzed by means of the chi-squared test for proportions and Mann-Whitney for independent samples. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in relation to the level of the colon’s cleanliness, patient’s satisfaction, the presence of foam, abdominal pain, and the duration of the exam. Fifteen percent of the exams of the mannitol group were interrupted while from the sodium picosulfate group it was 5 percent. The presence of foam was similar for both groups. The average duration for carrying out the exam was 28.44 minutes for the mannitol group and 35.59 minutes for the sodium picosulfate group. Abdominal distension was more frequent in the mannitol group. If they would have to do the same exam, the answer was that 80 percent said yes from the mannitol group and 92.5 percent...

RACIONAL: A limpeza do cólon para o exame de colonoscopia deve ser completa de modo a permitir a visualização e inspeção do lúmen intestinal. O agente de limpeza ideal deveria ser de fácil administração, com baixo custo e com o mínimo de efeitos colaterais. O picosulfato de sódio juntamente com o citrato de magnésio é um estimulante catártico e o manitol é um laxativo osmótico, ambos geralmente utilizados para este propósito. OBJETIVOS: Verificar a limpeza do cólon comparando o uso de manitol e picosulfato de sódio assim como avaliar o nível de satisfação do paciente, presença de espuma, dor e distensão abdominal em pacientes hospitalizados submetidos a colonoscopia. MÉTODOS: Estudo prospectivo, randomizado, simples-cego com 80 pacientes que comparou dois grupos: manitol (40) e picosulfato de sódio (40). Ambos os grupos receberam a mesma orientação dietética. O estudo foi aprovado pelo Comitê de Ética do hospital e pelo Comitê de Pesquisa. O endoscopista foi cego para o tipo de preparo. Desfechos avaliados: nível de limpeza do cólon, satisfação do paciente, presença de espuma, dor e distensão abdominal e tempo de duração do exame. Os dados foram analisados pelas médias de testes qui-quadrado para proporções e Mann-Whitney para amostras independentes. RESULTADOS: Não houve diferença significativa entre os grupos em relação ao nível de limpeza do cólon, satisfação do paciente, presença de espuma, dor abdominal e tempo de exame. Quinze porcento dos exames do grupo manitol foram interrompidos enquanto que grupo picosulfato de sódio foi de 5 por cento. A presença de espuma foi similar em ambos os grupos. A média de duração do exame foi de 28h 44min para o grupo manitol e 35h 59min para o grupo picosulfato de sódio. A distensão abdominal foi mais freqüente no grupo manitol. Se eles tivessem que repetir o exame, a resposta foi de 80 por cento disse sim do grupo manitol e 92,5 por cento do grupo picosulfato de sódio. CONCLUSÕES: A qualidade do...

Manejo del traumatismo encefalocraneano grave / Management of acute brain trauma

La medicina en general, y quizás de modo particular lo relacionado al traumatismo de cráneo (TEC), constituye una ciencia y un arte en continuo cambio. Por ello, esta pauta de manejo deberá ser reevaluada a la luz de nuevos reportes consensualmente aceptados, intentando adaptarlos a nuestra realidad de país en vías de desarrollo. Este protocolo de acuerdo a la literatura, considera como indispensable el monitoreo de presión intracraneana (PIC), situación que sabemos no es fácilmente asequible a muchos hospitales en Chile y que incluso no se cumple en la totalidad de los centros de trauma de países desarrollados. Finalmente, estas pautas no pretenden reemplazar el sentido común ni hacer olvidar que el propósito principal es procurar una atención médica integral, eficiente y oportuna. El trauma se erige como la primera causa de muerte en los niños mayores de un año; alrededor de un 85 por ciento de los pacientes con traumatismo infantil grave, tiene una lesión craneal asociada, situación que hace aumentar la tsa de mortalidad 26 veces en relación a los niños traumatizados que no la sufren. El TEC grave, como entidad clínica única, tiene una mortalidad elevada (11 por ciento) y un porcentaje de discapacidad residual importante

Manejo clínico del traumatismo encefalocraneano grave / Clinical management of the severe encephalocranial injuries

El TEC es la causa más frecuente de mortalidad e invalidez en niños y adultos jóvenes. Si bien el neurocirujano no puede prevenir los daños traumáticos primarios, la atención está dirigida a la prevención de los daños secundarios causados por hipotensión, hipoxemia y la prevención de complicaciones intracraneanas y sistémicas. Será fundamental el manejo de la presión intracraneana (PIC) con el fin de mantener una presión de perfusión cerebral (PPC) adecuada. Requiriendo todo paciente con un puntaje de 8 o menos en la escala de coma de glasgow (GCS) monitoreo de su PIC. Descartada la presencia de una lesión susceptible de manejo quirúrgico, las medidas indicadas son la hiperventilación moderada (pCO230-35 mm Hg) y el uso de sustancias hiperosmolares (manitol). En pacientes refractarios a estas medidas deberá discutirse como medida adicional el coma barbitúrico y la craneotomía decompresiva

Gradiente transcraneana de citoquinas y permeabilidad intestinal en la injuria cerebral aguda severa / Transcranial cytokine gradient and intestinal permeability in severe brain injury

Background: Acute brain injury is associated with a bimodal hypermetabolic state probably caused by cytokine secretion and high hormone and catecholamine concentrations. In a first stage, the brain would produce these substances and afterwards, another production source, most probably the splanchnic territory, would perpetuate the hypermetabolic state. Aim: To investigate the cytokine production source and to assess intestinal permeability in acute brain injury in the absence of cerebral ischemia and systemic oxygen deficit. Patients and methods: Arterial systemic and cerebral venous bulbar interleukin 1 õ and interleukin 6 levels were measured during the first seven days of evolution in 15 patients with acute brain injury. Serum lactate, the oxygen/lactate ratio, gastric intramucosal pH and intestinal permeability using the lactulose/mannitol test were also assessed in the same period. Results: High arterial and venous interleukin 1 õ and interleukin 6 levels were detected. A positive gradient for interleukin 6 levels was detected throughout the study period with normal intramucosal pH, lactate and oxygen/lactate ratio. There was also an early impairment of intestinal permeability in these patients. Conclusions: High arterial and venous cytokine concentrations were detected in patients with acute brain injury. The positive gradient for interleukin 6 suggests a brain origin for this cytokine. Intestinal permeability is also altered in these patients

Manitol y procedimientos neuroanestésicos / Mannitol and neuroanesthesical procedures

El manitol es un diurético hiperosmolar que se ha utilizado durante los últimos treinta años en procedimientos neuroanestésicos. Se han propuesto múltiples mecanismos para explicar su efecto sobre el edema cerebral: deshidratación cerebral ocasionada por aumento de la osmolaridad plasmática, vasoconstricción en respuesta a disminución de la viscosidad sanguínea y disminución de la formación de líquido cefalorraquídeo. Recientemente se ha estudiado su capacidad para reducir el daño isquémico, al disminuir los niveles de radicales libres en las zonas injuriadas. En la actualidad su uso se halla controvertido. entre sus ventajas se encuentran la disminución rápida y relativamente prolongada de la presión intracraneal, la preservación de la función renal y la forma sencilla de administración. Las alteraciones hidroelectrolíticas, la marcada variación interindividual de sus efectos y el riesgo de producir rebotes en la presión intracraneal demuestran que la infusión de manitol no carece de efectos nocivos. Se revisan las principales características farmacocinéticas, farmacodinámicas, indicaciones y efectos adversos del manitol, así como su utilidad en los principales procedimientos neuroanestésicos.

Manitol- fundamentos para sua utilizaçäo / Mannitol- reasons for its utilization

O diurético osmótico manitol é uma droga amplamente utilizada em neurociruriga e neurologia a fim de diminuir a pressäo intracraniana e melhorar a microcirculaçäo cerebral. As teorias sobre seu mecanismo de açäo säo revisadas: gradiente osmótico pela barreira hematoencefálica, auto-regulaçäo vascular e neutralizaçäo dos radicais livres do oxigênio. Sua posologia é empírica, segunda a experiência própria de cada autor. O conhecimento dos critérios básicos para o uso do manitol e de sua reposiçäo hidreletrolítica é fundamental para a manutençäo da osmolaridade sérica em valores terapêuticos